Greg Reese of Infowars did a video about how the Mark of the Beast might simply boil down to a social credit system in which one must prove themself worthy of receiving its benefits for obedience.
In this new digital prison system, you would be guilty until you prove that you were worthy of participation. Meaning, that every action within society would be tracked and monitored. If your actions were approved by the government authorities, you would receive a high score. A high score on the facial recognition scanners would equal being able to purchase food and other needed goods and services.
This is exactly how it is now being implemented in China. And it is possible that a system similar to China’s social credit system could be implemented in the United States, although it would likely be structured differently due to the different political, cultural, and legal contexts of the United States.
There are already a variety of systems in place in the United States that use data and scoring to assess the trustworthiness and creditworthiness of individuals and organizations. For example, credit scores are widely used to determine an individual’s creditworthiness and ability to borrow money, and there are also background check systems that assess the criminal and financial histories of individuals.
It is also possible that new forms of data and scoring could be used to assess trustworthiness and reputation in the United States. For example, social media and other online activity could potentially be used to create a “social credit score” that reflects an individual’s online behavior and reputation.
There are a number of potential negative consequences that could result from a social credit system, depending on how it is designed and implemented. Some possible negative consequences that could affect individuals include:
- Loss of privacy: A social credit system could potentially require the collection and analysis of a large amount of personal data, which could infringe on an individual’s privacy.
- Discrimination: There is a risk that a social credit system could be biased or discriminatory in its assessment of individuals, leading to unfair consequences for some groups.
- Reputational harm: A social credit score could potentially be based on subjective or incomplete information, leading to reputational harm for individuals who are wrongly perceived as untrustworthy or unreliable.
- Restriction of freedoms: A social credit score could potentially be used to restrict an individual’s access to certain services, opportunities, or privileges, potentially limiting their freedom and autonomy.
- Increased pressure to conform: A social credit system could potentially create pressure for individuals to conform to certain social norms or behaviors in order to maintain a high score.
Politicians or other individuals in positions of power could abuse a social credit system in order to exert control over others. For example, they might use a social credit score as a tool to reward or punish individuals based on their own political or personal agendas.
There is also a risk that a social credit system could be used to discriminate against certain groups or individuals, either intentionally or as a result of biases in the system. This could result in unfair consequences for these groups or individuals.
This describes the Mark of the Beast system exactly. As you probably already know, the “Mark of the Beast” is a term that is used in the Bible’s Book of Revelation to refer to a mark that is placed on the forehead or hand of individuals as a sign of their loyalty to the AntiChrist and his system. The term is used to refer to a system coming in the future that is oppressive and tyrannical.
Some people have used the term “Mark of the Beast” to describe social credit systems or similar systems that could be used to oppress or control individuals. This is due to concerns about the loss of privacy, the restriction of freedoms, or the risk of discrimination or abuse of power.
In the preceding video, Greg Reese points out many black ops technologies that are now being implored to create this new digital prison.
Leave a comment