Tag Archives: badmedicine

Coffee Linked To A Longer Life

Surprisingly, the findings showed that higher coffee intake (even 8 or more cups per day) was associated with a lower risk of death, regardless of caffeine metabolism. A meta-analysis of 36 studies involving more than 1.2 million people found that moderate coffee consumption appeared to be associated with a lower risk of heart disease; in addition, those who drank more than five cups a day had no greater risk. More than 700,000 people participated in the study, which found that the more coffee people drank, the less likely they were to die prematurely from a variety of diseases, including cancer, diabetes and heart disease. An analysis of 20 studies from 2013 and another study, including 17 studies, each involving more than 1 million people, found that drinking coffee slightly reduced the risk of all-cause death. As a sign of the times, the Department of Agriculture agreed in 2015 that “coffee can be incorporated into a healthy lifestyle,” especially if you keep to three to five cups a day (up to 400 mg of caffeine) and avoid being smeared with cream and sugar. …    

FREE BEVERAGE FOR NEW PEETNIK REWARDS MEMBERS Start the year off deliciously caffeinated. Enjoy a free beverage when you download the Peet’s app and use code LUCKY at signup. New Peetnik Rewards members only thru
Peets Coffee

The study, published last year in the British medical journal The BMJ, looked at more than 200 previous studies and suggested that drinking three to four cups of coffee a day may be beneficial, rather than harmful. SUMMARY A large study found that drinking 4-5 cups of coffee a day was associated with a lower risk of premature death. Many other studies have yielded similar results. The health effects of coffee have been extensively researched over the past few decades. A study involving more than 520,000 people in 10 European countries, making it the largest study to date on coffee and mortality, found that drinking more coffee can significantly reduce a person’s risk of death.    

By looking specifically at their populations, the study aimed to better understand the relationship between coffee consumption and its health effects associated with mortality. The JAMA study involved half a million people between the ages of 38 and 73 over 10 years, tracking coffee consumption, smoking status and certain health indicators, including death. After analyzing 40 studies involving 3,852,651 people and 450,256 causes of death, the researchers found that coffee consumption had an inverse relationship with all-cause mortality — regardless of age, overweight, or alcohol consumption. coffee “.  

                                                        According to the study, people who drank two to four cups of coffee a day had an 18% lower risk of death than those who did not drink coffee. Lower mortality was observed regardless of whether people drank regular or decaffeinated coffee, suggesting that the link was not caffeine-related, says V. Wendy Setiavan, senior study author and assistant professor of preventive medicine at the University of Southern California’s Keck School of Medicine.

    

In the United States, there are similar results linking higher coffee consumption with a lower risk of premature death in African Americans, Japanese Americans, Hispanics, and white adults, both men and women. Daily coffee habit has also been linked to a reduced risk of stroke and type 2 diabetes.    

While research does not show coffee prolongs life, several studies have shown an increase in life expectancy among decaf drinkers and those who regularly drink coffee. There have been studies claiming that drinking coffee increases longevity and overall health, and even studies against it.    

Recent studies have shown that drinking at least two cups of coffee a day can extend consumers’ lives by about two years. Drinking more than 8 cups of coffee a day was associated with a lower risk of death during a 10-year follow-up period, a new study found.    

FREE BEVERAGE FOR NEW PEETNIK REWARDS MEMBERS

Start the year off deliciously caffeinated. Enjoy a free beverage when you download the Peet’s app and use code LUCKY at signup. New Peetnik Rewards members only thru

However, the researchers noted that the study found links only with coffee and longevity and did not show that coffee prolongs life. But these studies looked at coffee consumption only after the onset of the disease, rather than taking into account the risk of all-cause mortality, as in the current article, Loftfield said. 

For the present study, researchers analyzed information provided by approximately 500,000 people who answered questions about their coffee consumption, smoking and alcohol use, medical history, and more. The researchers found that the more coffee the participants consumed, the lower the risk of death. But overall, compared to non-drinkers, those who drank a cup of coffee a day had an 8% lower risk of premature death, and this rate increased slightly with increasing consumption, peaking at 16% in those who drank between six and seven cups. day. before dropping slightly to 14% for those who drink eight or more cups a day. As in previous studies, coffee drinkers were more likely to drink and smoke than non-drinkers, but the researchers accounted for these factors, and coffee consumption seems to have canceled them out.     

In another study by Australian scientists, it was found that there is an optimal amount of coffee that is beneficial. Researchers at the University of South Australia decided in their study published this month to find out how much coffee is good for your health. They compared consumption of four cups of coffee a day and found that this resulted in a greater reduction in deaths from certain causes and deaths from all causes than consumption without coffee.    

The benefits of drinking coffee have also been found in Parkinson’s disease, depression, and Alzheimer’s disease. Other studies have linked coffee consumption to a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, gallstones and certain cancers, as well as Parkinson’s disease. But previous research has linked moderate coffee consumption with a lower risk of Alzheimer’s, diabetes, heart disease and certain types of cancer. Previous research by USC and other organizations has shown that drinking coffee can reduce the risk of many types of cancer, diabetes, liver disease, Parkinson’s disease, type 2 diabetes and other chronic diseases.  

MEET THE NEW

PEETNIK REWARDS

Even more rewards, even faster.
Get the app to get started now.

Setiwan, who drinks one to two cups of coffee a day, said the positive effects of drinking coffee can have far-reaching consequences, as a large number of people enjoy or depend on it on a daily basis. Coffee drinkers are less likely to die than non-coffee drinkers. Several studies have shown that regular coffee consumption is associated with a lower risk of dying from various serious diseases. People who drink up to 8 cups of coffee a day may have a slightly lower risk of premature death compared to nondrinkers, according to a large new study. Drinking unlimited caffeinated coffee may put you at risk, but researchers say you shouldn’t have to worry about drinking up to five cups a day.    

You may be wondering if this means you will live longer if you drink a lot of coffee. Therefore, coffee can add not only years to your life, but life to your years. Not only is coffee said to be good for the liver (yes, indeed), but new research shows that coffee can add years to your life as well.    

According to a study published Monday, a new study links coffee consumption to increased lifespan. Drinking three to four cups of Italian coffee a day can lower mortality and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, according to a study. 

POLIO is a man-made disease caused by heavy metals exposure, not a virus… the entire history of polio and vaccines was fabricated

Image: POLIO is a man-made disease caused by heavy metals exposure, not a virus… the entire history of polio and vaccines was fabricated

(Natural News) A common retort from vaccine advocates whenever healthy skepticism is expressed against vaccination is that were it not for the jabs, we would still be dealing with epidemics of things like polio. But is this actually true?

Forrest Maready, author of the book The Moth in the Iron Lung: A Biography of Polio, tells a much different story about polio that suggests it is not actually a contagious virus that can be vaccinated against, but is rather a set of symptoms caused by environmental contaminants.

While there was no pharmaceutical industry to speak of in 1789, a doctor at that time by the name of Michael Underwood first observed what he described as a “debility of the lower extremities” in children – or what many today would refer to as polio. Not knowing what it was, Underwood chalked it up to teething and foul bowels.

Several decades later, the situation worsened with increasingly more children developing this strange paralysis, usually in their legs. Despite still not knowing what it was, doctors gave it a name: poliomyelitis, with the word polio standing for “grey,” as in grey tissue, and myelitis standing for inflammation of the spinal cord.

“A poliomyelitis was a lesion on your spinal cord,” Maready explains. “You could have more than one of them. But they didn’t know why children had begun developing them, seemingly out of nowhere.”

Scientific tests later linked arsenic, a popular medical ingredient at the time, to paralysis of the hind legs. Mercury, another common metal used in infant teething products, was also linked to the disease.

Throughout most of the 1800s, poliomyelitis would pop up here and there in children but there were no major epidemics of it. Then in the 1890s, the first outbreaks of polio suddenly emerged right around the time that a new arsenate-based pesticide was introduced.

This chemical concoction, which was designed to fight off the gypsy moth, contained both lead and arsenic. It was sprayed all over the Northeast right before the first real epidemics of poliomyelitis first began to emerge in the United States – also, not surprisingly, in the Northeast.

Not only children but also horses, dogs, chickens, pigs and other animals suddenly started to develop similar symptoms and many of them died. The cause? Lesions in their spinal cords caused by, you guessed it: heavy metal-induced poliomyelitis.

“Vaccines” contain heavy metals that cause polio and other diseases

It is important to note that polio as modern medicine defines it does not infect animals. So how, then, did animals “catch” and die from it back in the late 1800s? The answer is that poliomyelitis is a metal toxicity disease, not a contagious viral disease.

Just like there is no such thing as a “covid” virus since SARS-CoV-2 has never actually been isolated, polio has not and cannot be pegged down as a specific infectious disease. Neither of these two illnesses meets Koch’s Postulates, either – meaning they have never been isolated and proven to exist as contagions.

“Koch’s Postulates were some research guidelines that basically stipulated there was a single causative microbe for every disease,” Maready explains.

The fact that polio is not a virus was further confirmed years later when it was discovered that many different things besides arsenic also caused poliomyelitis. One of them is “vaccines,” which we know contain all sorts of viruses, bacteria and other toxic materials that are injected directly into the body, bypassing its defenses.

What this suggests is that seemingly viral illnesses are either injected through vaccines or are caused by environmental pollution. There is no evidence to suggest that either polio or covid is a contagious virus that can be spread through the mouth or nose via airborne particulates.

Even so, the medical consensus is one that seeks to categorize these things as contagious diseases rather than symptoms caused by other factors. This false theory started to gain traction back in the 1800s and has since become the standard by which modern medicine gauges infectious diseases.

It is unfortunate that the practice of medicine went down this wrong path because millions have needlessly suffered, and many have died as a result. With polio, there was always one common denominator that was systematically overlooked as the cause, and that was environmental pesticides.

“I believe ingested pesticides, known to cause cellular membrane dysfunction, created a path directly from the intestines to the bottom of the spinal cord, located directly behind, for the viruses and bacteria to take hold,” Maready says, noting that polio almost always affected young children the worst, and nearly always in the same lower part of their spinal cord right behind their intestines.

“This is why multiple viruses (poliovirus, coxsackievirus, echovirus, etc.) all began paralyzing children around this time. It wasn’t a genetic mutation. It wasn’t sanitation improvements. It was a physical alteration of the gut integrity by pesticides.”

Maready’s thesis also explains why older people are not nearly as at-risk for polio compared to younger children. As a person grows older, the positioning of the spinal cord in relation to the intestines moves apart, decreasing the risk of the gray matter of the spinal cord getting infected and inflamed.

“This is why the injected Salk polio vaccine worked so poorly,” Maready further explains.

“It created antibodies for only one of many viruses that could paralyze, and it created antibodies in the blood – a useless defense against an intestinal infection” (you can read the rest of the story on Maready’s Twitter thread).

More related news can be found at Vaccines.news.

Sources for this article include:

TheReaderApp.com

NaturalNews.com